WebCase :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 291 of 2024 Petitioner :- Pandit Shubham Mangal @ Shankar Lal Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 8 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Yogendra Pal Singh Counsel for Respondent :- G.A. Hon'ble Raj Beer Singh,J. 1. The present petition has been preferred under Article 227 of the Constitution WebSimilarly, a petition under Section 482 of Cr. P.C. would also not lie. I am of the opinion that once this Court holds that a petition under Article 227 would lie, the result would be as is evident from the above petitions that every order on charge which earlier used to be assailed by way of revision would be
Explained: Rule of alternate remedy and maintainability of …
Web20 apr. 2024 · “Under Article 226 of the Constitution, the High Court, having regard to the facts of the case, has a discretion to entertain or not to entertain a writ petition. But the High Court has imposed upon itself certain restrictions one of which is that if an effective and efficacious remedy is available, the High Court would not normally exercise its jurisdiction. Web2 mrt. 2024 · Such matters are well within the jurisdiction of the Tribunal, and do not call for interference of this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution," the Court observed. The plea was accordingly ... inclusive ways in health and social care
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE …
WebArticle 227 of the Constitution of India gives the High Court the power of superintendence over all courts and tribunals in its territorial jurisdiction. This jurisdiction cannot be limited … WebCase :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 56 of 2024 Petitioner :- Smt. Tulsarani And Another Respondent :- Union Of India And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Nand Kishor Mishra,Shilpa Ahuja Counsel for Respondent :- A.S.G.I.,C.S.C.,Jai Krishna Narain Sharma,Pranjal Mehrotra Hon'ble J.J. Munir,J. 1. This petition under Article 227 of the ... Web11 dec. 2015 · Saffold, the Supreme Court discussed whether a 4 1/2 month delay in filing a habeas petition in the California courts was unreasonable. 536 U.S. 214, 226-227 (2002).Rather than find the 4 1/2 month delay unreasonable outright, the Supreme Court remanded the matter to the Ninth Circuit to determine if the delay was unreasonable. inclusive wealth index data